Universal Cash Assistance for Low-Income Families through Rise Up Cambridge
Overview
This case study examines Rise Up Cambridge, a guaranteed income pilot program for low-income families implemented by the City of Cambridge in partnership with Cambridge Economic Opportunity Committee and the Cambridge Community Foundation and funded with federal American Rescue Plan Act fiscal recovery funds. The case study reviews the program's origins, design, implementation, and evaluation plans, offering insights into how thoughtfully designed guaranteed income programs can address economic inequality and financial instability.
Key Findings
Rise Up Cambridge was the first non-lottery based cash assistance program in the country; every household with children living at or below 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Level could receive $500 per month for 18 months.
The program enrolled 1,922 out of an estimated 2,000 eligible households in the City; close to half of the enrolled families were at or below 100 percent of FPL.
The City conducted targeted outreach to enroll the most economically vulnerable families, working with 60 community-based organizations to distribute information and providing assistance to residents who failed to complete their applications.
Implications for Policy and Practice
Local policymakers should consider implementing guaranteed income programs that center equity and prioritize historically underserved communities.
The Rise Up model demonstrates 1) how local governments can work with local philanthropic partners to design and evaluate innovative, equity-driven programs and 2) how it is possible to design financial assistance programs that minimize administrative burden and serve all eligible participants.
Future federal investments should integrate lessons from ARPA, with a focus on transparency, equity, and sustainable long-term outcomes for marginalized populations.
Related Evidence
-
Published June 1, 2025
This report explores public banking as a critical tool for advancing a rights-based economy grounded in racial justice, Indigenous sovereignty, and environmental sustainability. The authors argue that public banks, when governed by democratic principles and equity-centered mandates, can challenge the extractive logic of private finance and help meet collective needs.
-
Published June 1, 2025
This report argues for the integration of guaranteed income (GI) policies with public banking initiatives to create a more effective and equitable system for cash transfers in the United States. It highlights the limitations of the existing private financial infrastructure in distributing pandemic-era relief funds and proposes public banking as a solution to ensure timely, low-cost, and secure disbursements of guaranteed income payments.
-
Published September 24, 2024
This policy brief describes how local policymakers can design and implement guaranteed income pilot programs to combat poverty, address income disparities, and improve community health and well-being.
-
Published May 1, 2024
This report explores public perceptions of guaranteed income programs and identifies key strategies for framing the narrative to build broader support. Drawing on extensive research and public opinion data, it provides insights into effective messaging that resonates across diverse communities and political perspectives.
-
Published September 24, 2024
This case study examines the Denver Basic Income Project, a pilot initiative supported by the City of Denver using federal American Rescue Plan Act funds that provides direct, unconditional cash payments to unhoused people.
-
Published September 24, 2024
This case study examines the Multnomah Mother’s Trust, a guaranteed income pilot program funded by Multnomah County’s using federal American Rescue Plan Act funds that provided $500 in monthly direct cash assistance to 100 Black mothers living in Multnomah County, Oregon over a 24-month period from May 2022 through June 2024.
-
Published April 5, 2024
Researchers at the New School propose a new nationwide direct cash payments program that would automatically kick in when economic indicators point to a recession and phase out when the national unemployment rate begins to decline.